EIDIEN versus THE STATE
The crime of fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Conduct Code (XLV, 1860), Sections 452, 148, 365 and 344, substantiated the allegation that the kidnapper was married, but He had no right under this law to forcibly remove her and imprisoned her for almost two months against her will. This fact was substantiated by the evidence of his father, who alleged that he had neither committed adultery at home nor taken any weapon. As a result, the accused was acquitted of the charges under Sections 10 (3) and 11, the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 and Sections 452 and 148, PPC, but this time 365 and 344, were sentenced under PPC. He was punished accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Farooqabad lawyer
