ROZAL versus STATE
The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 20 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), while examining the evidence of section 395, changed the face of the complainant to the robber's house and after the arrest of the accused Couldn't detect it. The identification parade was not conducted and was sentenced and sentenced by the trial court for withdrawal and amnesty behind the co-accused tape recorder, the radio and TV set recovered on the accused's notice was that of Philips Mac. According to the FIR, there were articles related to the complainant. The National MAC suspect was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Nankana Sahib lawyer
