FARZAND ALI versus RAJA MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 5/10 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Constitutional Amendment alleges that the male accused (applicant no.1) was not married to the female accused (applicant no. 2). can do. His first wife was a stepmother, because at the same time the marriage of the mother and her daughter was forbidden to be together illegally in Islam, even though in the past between the first accused wife of the male suspect and the male accused. There was a relationship. The accused was his father's wife, but after her father's death she became completely alien to him because of her lack of cohesion, commitment or upbringing. In the absence of any other relationship, the male could not marry the accused with the accused. It should be declared illegal only on the basis that the female accused had been the wife of the father of the present wife of the male accused and the marriage of the two accused was declared legitimate, no case was filed against him. Under any section of the Enforcement Hood Ordinance, in 1979, the Sessions Court order ordered the accused to appear for trial in the complaint case, which resulted in his separation and The action to initiate against was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Neelam lawyer