Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD ALI versus STATE

The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), definition of evidence under section 646464, CCP charged with raping both criminals. Were referred to as eyewitnesses to events that were not presented as witnesses during the trial and instead presented other witnesses as eyewitnesses to the incident. Who had not seen the original. Incident, but only said they saw the culprits fleeing from the wall of the house, the incident was reported more than 24 hours later and no such delay was detected. It has been reported that the medical examination of the affected people took two days. After the alleged incident and the doctor who inspected the affected doctor removed that the affected woman was also addicted to sexual orientation earlier in the FIR, that she appeared to be an abusive FIR girl, One person was accused of the crime, while two others were named accused during the trial and it was not known who of the three accused failed to appear in the prosecution. Is. Prove the case against the accused, the accused was tried and acquitted and acquitted criminal advocate from Shogram lawyer