Section 517 prohibited (enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD was the petitioner, including the accused, who entered the settlement of the property, who failed to hold the case. ? That the heroin recovered from the car was not owned by the accused and had nothing to do with it, and the original culprit was the co-accused who used the aforementioned vehicle for the purpose of carrying his heroin without any knowledge or consent. Thus, the order to seize the car in favor of the state that was entitled to the possession of the car was consequently withdrawn and the car was ordered to be handed over to the applicants.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
