MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus THE STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article 4 The testimony officer appreciating the evidence, who was the complainant and the recovery testimony in this case also did not appear in the witness box as the prosecutor's witness and therefore the accused was very prejudiced. Was made The operating record was brought by the prosecution for not investigating the Investigation Officer and other restitution witnesses. The entire prosecution case relied on the mere statement of a recovered witness, who was a police constable, and the accused could not be safely prosecuted for his irrational testimony, which is being tried again. The accused was not in the interest of justice as he had already spent more than two years in prison and the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Hassan Abdal lawyer
