Find a Lawyer

SAIF SHAH versus GULNAZ BOKHARI

Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 10 (3) / 18 Evidence The medical evidence shows that the victim's hormone is not sustained nor any injury to any part of her body. And neither was she. The presence of semen on the vaginal shrubs found locally bleeding could not necessarily prove to be intrusive as the accused could have been excluded outside the vagina in an attempt to obtain penetration and on the occasion the presence of the suspect was established. Has attempted to commit adultery. The bill was with the victim but he could not have been able to intervene in any way under Section 10 (3) of the Enforcement Ordinance 1979, and consequently section 10 (3) of the said ordinance. Was changed to / 18. Was reduced accordingly famous high court advocate from Chunian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes