Find a Lawyer

CHIRAGH DIN versus STATE

Haram (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 was accused of defining evidence that was convicted of possessing 500 grams of heroin and claiming that the alleged heroin rehabilitation was done by police officers. Who was the prosecution witness in this case. He was not shown any enmity with the accused, nor was he found to be falsely involved with any ill-intention, but when confronted, he encouraged confidence. He was rightly convinced to prove the guilt of the evidence presented by K and the trial court. Controversial statements regarding the whereabouts of the accused and the whereabouts of the heroin were found, the defendant proved to be somewhat self-destructive, the accused failed to prove his innocence, the trial court found the accused guilty of the crime and his The resulting sentence was retained, but the trial court sentenced the accused to a sentence that appears to be high, which was low. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Zahir Pir lawyer