MAJ. -GEN. (RETD.) ABDUL AZIZ versus MST. KANWAL RABBANI
Sections 7/11 and 6 (c) of the Qazf (Enforcement Border) Ordinance 1979, Article Pakistan (1973), Article 203DD Criminal Code of Conduct (VII 1898), Articles 561A & 265C (2) Termination of Nikki Action Eight Months After the first allegation, the complainant had kept silent, indicating that the complaint was filed as a retaliation for the divorce and that the second charge was wrongly invented. The developer did not file a summary for proof of proof. In addition to his complaint of prosecution case under section 265C (2), the PCP did not have any evidence available on record regarding the first allegation, while the evidence regarding the second allegation was ambiguous because it did not, at any time, date. And did not disclose the place. The matter of the presence of the complainant and his witness was contentious during the inquiry into the presence of all the accused at the time of the allegation, Section 6 required at least two Muslim adult male witnesses. (C) Gaddaf's crime (Enforcement of Limitation) Ordinance, 1979, where only one female witness was mentioned in the first indictment complaint but was not presented during the initial investigation, Substantial content, thus, was available to the trial court for order to proceed against the accused applicants, resulting in a gross misuse of pending prosecution against the accused, according to which the trial court Was suspended.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Pirpai lawyer