MAQSOOD SHAH versus STATE
Criminal offense (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) The police officer complaining of evidence did not obtain a search warrant from a magistrate to search the premises, nor did he find any person in the area mentioned above. Shared. As a witness in the FIR, the witness mentioned in the FIR had requested to reach the scene of the incident with the police party, but the circumstances described in the prosecution's story not only contradicted the version, but also the woman. Did not appeal because of the suspect's vaginal pressure. The Chemical Examiner complaining police officer did not receive any semen stains or made all such illegal and inhumane plays to entice a friend or for extraordinary purposes - he was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer
