Find a Lawyer

SHABBIR AHMAD ALIAS BHOLA versus THE STATE

The crime of fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 11 and 10 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the prosecution's testimony of the definition of section 109 evidence did not show how the accused was connected to the main accused. They were present at the time of the incident, when the main suspect and his accomplice were forced to take the abductor on a motorbike, the prosecution's witnesses said. The defendant's role had improved his statements before the court. The offense of abduction was found to be a criminal offense with the intent to punish under Section 11 of the Zen (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance of 1979, therefore, no more than reasonable suspicion of any abductor was recorded that the accused had recorded his Time was keeping an eye on it. The trial of the main accused along with the adultery was also improved by his trial, which could not have been the basis for conviction under Se. ction109, PPC acquitted under section 10 (3) of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979. top advocate from Gojra lawyer