Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE

The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, value 10 evidence, but no injuries were found in or around the vagina, and the chemical analyst's report is also in the negative and the complainant was investigated by the investigating officer. No injuries were found on the body of the woman when she went to the police station to complain, she said. At sunrise, but she went to the police station around 4pm, who said that the report had been delayed and that no explanation had been given for justifying the legal proceedings. The person mentioned in the report mentioned the person was not presented as a witness during the incident. The parties were close relatives because the accused was the father-in-law of the son-in-law and the complainant was the son of the complainant. Had filed an affidavit in court stating that there was misunderstanding between their families. Was gone and the accused did not commit the crime for which his mother had complained, the complainant was not targeted sexual partner, but was born between the complainant's son and the accused's daughter-in-law. Due to the differences, some repetition may be levied by the complainant on the charge leveled against the accused, which was not substantiated by any evidence. And the conviction of the accused by the trial court was set aside and he was acquitted of the crime which led to his conviction and sentence. online advocate from Sita Road lawyer