MUKAMIL SHAH versus THE STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 4 Article 4 Definition of record of evidence No inquiry into the matter was disclosed The accused was neither arrested nor identified on the spot. He could be shown that he was driving the vehicle where the heroin was, after being prosecuted by police prosecution witnesses who claimed to be owned by the investigating officer. Because of her heroin export, she could not be treated innocent. On the basis of the statements made by the police under section 161 or 164, the CR did not prove the truth in the court till the PC.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Mardan lawyer
