Find a Lawyer

BRIGADE COMMANDER HEADQUARTERS FIELD COMMAND NLC, KARACHI versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 320 Pakistan Army Act (XXXI of 1941), 59 59 59, 94 and 95 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), SS 549 and 561 refused to move the Election Court case. There is no doubt about the offense of military authority in which the accused was cheated, the sessions court held a special hearing, but as the accused Army personnel, the Pakistan Army was under the Act and was Under the law, he should be handed over to military authorities. Prior to the trial by the military court, the Sessions Court had assigned the accused to prosecute the accused under the Pakistan Army Act 1952, to prosecute the accused, because the aforementioned army. The authorities had to make a decision under Sections 9 and 4. As a result of the Sessions Court order refusing to transfer the matter to the military authorities about the Army Act 95 where the accused was to be tried, the order was issued that the accused be handed over to Milita. ry authorities for trial lawer from fb area from Kabir Wala lawyer