Sections 302 (b) and 364 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (4) Qatil Adm, kidnapping and kidnapping a man under the age of fourteen, trader for adultery The testimony of the testimony was immediately entered in the FIR, in which the complainant named both the accused. The accused had confessed to the prosecution's witnesses about the rape and murder of the accused. Although the extra-judicial admission was a weak type of evidence, it could be considered controversial as the final evidence and the presence of other material evidence available on record in the form of medical evidence. Counsel for the accused in the presence of evidence that the investigating officer did not fulfill the requirements of Section 103, CRPC, and no independent witness was associated with it, was of no importance because in such cases blood The fact that no other person except the relationship proceeded to perform the duties of becoming a witness was a fact in fact, but the prosecution had on the last case evidence, extra-judicial confessions, medical evidence together, and a Together with the medical evidence, he was able to prove his case. No link was found in retrieval. No conflicts between the medical evidence and the account of the accused were found and thus strengthened each other. There was no possibility of prosecution for making false accusations of the accused and prosecuting the accused. Usually trivial and technical witnesses were examined at length, but the truth of them
