Responsible for affecting Section 10 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) / 34 of adultery, Qital Ahmed appreciating the evidence filed an FIR of double murder immediately and the accused The name was specifically mentioned in which there is ocular evidence of eyewitness testimony. In harmony with each other, neither was there any major contradiction, nor could the defense aspect break their evidence in material detail. The defense party was unable to establish a defensible defense, nor was the event and location. Their presence on the spot can be denied. The medical account also corrects the prosecution's version, as the prosecution's witnesses have stated, one of the prosecution's witnesses remained consistent with the other two witnesses in terms of material details, the prosecution's story appears to be a contradiction of trust. The probable verdict, which remained unstable and unstable, did not, in the circumstances, warrant interference. After the prosecution was successful, the trial court maintained the trial against the accused beyond reasonable doubt and conviction.
