Sections 10 (3) and 11 commit adultery, forcing a woman to abduct or marry, blaming Taseer. Evidence appreciated. It is alleged that her marriage was with the age of the alleged abductor, according to the woman she was 16 years old at the time of her medical examination the alleged abduction mate was not legally transparent with the accused. Because none of his parents or relatives were involved in the process, which could legally and legally support the defendant's claim. The nika allegedly did not present any of the witnesses to the marriage, and did not present the nikah in favor of the nikah request. Nor was there any other material about the plaintiff's registration of the same playwright, it had no legal value or weight that the alleged kidnapper had entered into a marital agreement with the accused with her free consent, The commission of intercourse with the accused / alleged kidnapper was presented. Zina Bill Jaber's definition of alleged kidnapper was only 16 years old, while the accused was over 44 years old and could be better than her father's age The question of free consent and intelligent choice of 16 year old girl, In such circumstances, even if the alleged consent of the victim was obtained by fear of the victim, it was not free consent and was not considered free choice for Nika, the crime of adultery. The ordinance, 1979, of some of the components of Section 11 (Enforcement), emphasized that the suspect was armed with a gun at the time of the incident, with The display element was found to demonstrate strength, the prosecution n circumstances
