Sections 10 (3) and 11 define the evidence of rape and abduction Victim reported to the police immediately after his recovery / return that he alleged that he had divorced her ex-husband. After taking the contract of marriage to the deceased, it was proved that it had no legal value. The accused filed a compensation claim for marital rights against the victim in order to add credibility to the victim's false marriage claim. And to make it irrelevant, a one-sided story of compromise was added to allow the trial court to reverse the false civil rights restoration case before the facts came to fruition. His dismissal of the claim reinforced the charge that when the accused was kept by the accused, he was subjected to illicit sexual intercourse. And all this deception was that in a paperwork the crime was to be concealed. If the marriage claim had any knowledge of the truth, it would have presented the maid, the maid / registrar and the record and record without any loss. In this regard, the keeper of the Union Council during the trial, but did not say that it was alleged that he had been found guilty of kidnapping and that the adulteress was with him, as the accused. It is claimed that the bride was presented to the High Court in the appeal phase, which speaks of the isolation statement of her face, in each case such cases had to be properly investigated in the allegations and evidence. The definition of "adultery" showed that all the elements of section 11 of the offense of adultery (Inf
