Section 17 (4) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX-1965), Section 13 Harabah, during which the murder is committed, the definition of unlicensed weapons was defined as mere proof of the case without the prosecution. In connection with the testimony of the witnesses, full contacts of the chain were not provided and every testimony of these witnesses was stopped at a particular point and did not extend the case to the neck of the accused, as was necessary on the basis of all the cases. The evidence of the circumstances was purely speculative and allegedly based on the fact that the incident where the murder took place was more than a mile away from the house of the prosecutor's witnesses, none of the prosecution's witnesses cited any evidence that was the basis. Or show a link to their opinion, nothing was on record to show that the deceased had any weapon that was used during the struggle between them. The accused himself did not reveal anything about the prosecution witness who was the victim's son, he did not disclose any evidence It was because of which he believed that the accused had killed his father. The prosecution witness also admitted that he was not present with his father while he was driving the taxi. I was from a remote area of the accused and no witnesses of the prosecution did not know their name, no identity was dropped by the prosecution even though the petition was moved for that purpose. The confessional statement was the place to record when the suspects refused to report a confession made by the forensic science laboratory,
