Section 12 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 77 Kid77 defining sodomy evidence for abduction or abduction of a person, giving the FIR details of the day's events on the same day. In which the accused was named. The star witness who was a witness in this case was trivial at the time, but his statement proved to be a witness to be recorded; the incident was investigated at length, but did not corroborate the fact. Jaska. The statement was fully confirmed by the complainant. The minor statement of the victim was sufficient to substantiate the allegation as it was consistent, controversial and credible and has full support from the medical evidence, the Chemical Examiner's report was positive and after observing the Chemical Examiner's report The doctor was charged with felony charges, which was evidence. Medical evidence, the Chemical Examiner's report, the self-victimization statement which the complainant endorsed, was sufficient to link the accused to the crime, without any suspicion that the accused could produce any kind of collusion. Evidence to prove that he was wrongly involved in the case, and that the prosecution's witnesses had suspended their respective interstate in writing for the accused in an alleged agreement between the parties. Could not present the point. Even if the offense was not otherwise known, no controlling circumstances could be identified whereby the accused could guarantee a reduction in the trial court's sentence, in which case the culprits were convicted or sentenced.
