Sections 10 and 11 define the evidence of rape and abduction, although the reduction of the accused was not designated in the FIR, but in its statement under section 164, the CCP abducted and raped the accused lady doctor. Specifically accused of testing. The victim had observed that the victim was sexually assaulted by a chemical executor, which was also positive as the fish were found to have stained semen, which led the Lady doctor to have sexual intercourse with the affected woman. Which confirmed that he proved the victim's murder statement. In the absence of a valid marriage, such intercourse against the accused is considered adultery, which needs to be analyzed whether or not it is an adulterous act, Medicaid's legal report says, Marker not shown. , Especially those that can provide evidence of violence or use of force by the accused. Or the resistance offered by the victim in this regard, the adulteress may be charged with forcibly identifying the adulteress. The provisions of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 under Sections 11 and 10 (4) of the Adultery, as well as Section 10 (3) of the Penalty of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979 could not be proved and the Ordinance Was changed to section 10 (2) and his sentence was reduced from fourteen years to ten years \ rigorous imprisonment, under the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
