The testimony of the Section 392 robbery was filed by the complainant in the FIR immediately after the incident, as well as the physical properties of the two accused were given to the FIR even though private witnesses have no connection with the case. But, of course, police witnesses cannot be dismissed solely on the basis that they are police officers, unless there is a strong reason to believe that the eyewitness and the victim were paralyzed. I chose both of the 15 accused. At the same time, her son and other witnesses were subjected to lengthy scrutiny, but no favorable result was obtained in favor of the defense as the complainant's son falsely accused the police. What can happen. Neither the police nor the complaining party made any grudge against the accused. The snatching articles were also re-apprehended. Had also discussed the defense request made by the. And for reasons that led to the conclusion that the defendants were found guilty in their statements under Section 342, the CCP simply denied the allegations and said that they were falsely implicated in the case. But the accused did not examine himself. In their defense, the prosecution proved the allegations against the accused under oath, with minor contradictions and irregularities; if in any case, the defendants would not be assisted, the federal court would intervene in the trial.
