Sections 302 and 380 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 5 murder A burglary in the residence of a noble, residential house, although it was anonymous and no evidence of theft. Direct evidence was not available. From the inside of the house, neither about the murder of the deceased, but by the prosecution's fragmentation and fragmentation of the evidence presented by the prosecutor, beyond any reasonable doubt substantiated the guilt of the accused. Gone was the last time evidence was given by prosecution witnesses who saw the deceased alive. Accused C witness The witness's company saw the accused at different times, but since they saw him in different places at one place, there was little material difference over time. The presence of witnesses there was natural and not an opportunity. Used to have Witnesses said the witnesses were residents of the same village and they were well aware of the suspect No hostility, illicit desire or hostility was attributed to anyone One of the witnesses said the witnesses had to face the truth and inspirational faith. In addition to the most unusual contradictions, his statements were fully considered in the natural details; being a resident of the same village, he had no difficulty in identifying the accused as well as the subpoena witnesses. Was. A lengthy investigation, but to defend their evidence was not fruitful as the delay in the FLR registration was delayed by a few hours as the complaining party sought to find out the suspect during the investigation. Been busy The party stole jewelry and other items
