Section 10 adultery Bill Jaber praised the evidence The minor girl, aged 9-10, was subjected to forced sexual abuse through a forced complaint, an FIR filed immediately alleging that the accused had abused her minor daughter The prosecution had fully supported the prosecution witness. The complainant Syed's testimony was examined, but he was not raised with any material question to establish the accused Victim girl's innocence despite being elderly at the time, but he was accused of adultery. He gave a thorough account of the events taking place in his statement. The cross-examination by Bill Jaber could not break the accused woman's allegiance, which shows that she gave the correct account because there was no possibility of tutoring her lady doctor who examined the affected woman, Said that the victim was sexually assaulted and her report was also a Chemical Examiner positive ocular account, medical evidence and statement of the victim, all of which were in accordance with each other and were allegedly related to the prosecution witness. Unable to prove the allegations was a relevant witness from the village and was adulterated In such cases, it was highly unlikely that more witnesses would be available to a minor infected girl, her father being the most natural and legally responsible person (guardian), for God's sake, as her duty. Claiming to be a witness to him and in his own interest that no violence was reported on the victim's body, had no material weight. The chastity of the little girl's bleeding, her own innocent person
