The Section 395 dossier testified that the three prosecution witnesses were police officers, taking advantage of the suspect's testimony when no reason was given by the prosecutor in this regard, so that the available records could not link the accused to the recovered articles. And stolen articles of large sums were recovered and identified by the complainant, irrespective of the fact that it did not take appropriate action. In this regard, in the absence of any significant piece of evidence, the police can be foiled without any difficulty, in order to save the real culprits, the complainant has at some stage been detailing stolen articles and money. Had neither given nor offered. Receipts of gold jewelery stolen property recovered from the trial court were not properly executed and the recovered property was not presented to the court during the trial, keeping the trial court's affidavit separate. So that all the accused were acquitted and released.
