Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NADEEM ALIAS DEEMI versus STATE

Articles 308 and 201 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), sections 164 and 364 (1) defined the evidence as both the accused were of age, between 9 and 14 years the accused remained in police custody for 13 days, after which he confessed to the crime record. has been. The conviction was recorded, and he, too, was a minor in police custody, which was not explained by the prosecution and was completely ignored by the trial court while the state prosecutor confessed that the accused. There has been an unreasonable delay of 13 days in recording the confession of the crime, no matter what the apparent value of the confession for the confession crime against them was neither voluntary nor repressive nor was it on record. According to the second evidence, the two accused withdrew their confession in their statements under Section 234, CR PC, which found Works that statement was not given time to think before the magistrate that he was not given the notice may be treated against him. n The accused, who was given half an hour to think about it, was appointed by the trial court to instruct the jail authorities to release both the verdicts against the accused. power of attorney advocate Jhang lawyer