Find a Lawyer

MST. SIRAJA AND ANOTHER versus STATE

Appreciating the evidence of section 10 (2) The present case was a very traumatic event where children accused their own mother of adultery and threw her into the gallows of crime for their immorality. It shows that the accused was a woman with seven children and was 40 years of age, while her co-accused was 20 years old, the husband of the accused worked abroad and lived in a joint family system in Pakistan. The prosecution was successfully able to prove that the accused was on a condition with the co-accused, none of the prosecution identified the witness or identified the accused as the woman involved in the burqa. She may have been another woman, but it is not necessary to allege that the prosecution had committed adultery among the accused persons. Had failed to work, a witness for the prosecution had no evidence that the prosecution had admitted. All that the two suspects lived together in the place, there is no doubt that the accused's son and daughter's allegations may be true, but much more was needed to convict the accused. Submitting the suspect's daughter that he had seen the adulteress committed by the accused, but before the practical application of the law on the basis of the FIR, there was an incident that could not be established. ? The chemical report revealed that the human organs were found on the bushes taken from the suspect, but the suspect was arrested on four clays after the arrest of the co-accused and he was not arrested from the home of the co-accused chemical report. , The situation was suspicious. Trial best law firms from Killa Saifullah lawyer