Find a Lawyer

ASHIQ ALI versus STATE

While appreciating the provisions of Sections 302 (b) and 392, the accused was not named in the FIR, but the next day he was named in his statement under Section 161, CRPC, as well as P.C. Was also given in his statement regarding PK's oath. An FIR magistrate had given full details of the accused and threatened the accused that if he made his name known, he would face serious consequences when the accused's lawyer, in Section 164, Cr. Failed to inspect complainant when he appeared under PC. The accused was not disclosed in the FIR and when the complainant complained to the hospital, why did she remain silent even though she was the only eyewitness and was not available as a prosecution witness, but was not included in the FIR The statement under section 154, CR 151 at the hospital under the CRPC, and especially under the section 646464, was on the record relating to the CCP oath, the complainant was examined by the accused's lawyer. , When he made a statement under oath in Section 6464, CRPC, in the presence of the AC. Because of this, but its position was stable and stable. To say that the complainant's statements contained in his complaint and under section 1 under64 will be dismissed because the CCP has no identifiable value, the statement on oath under section 164 under Granted, the CRPC will stand tall with the straightforward simplicity of the statement that gives the respected person the right to investigate a witness, if it contains medical reports, chemical reports, restitution memorandum, word space. See also the case, fully and independently established litigation law firms from Dhirkot lawyer