Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus STATE

Section 10 (3) Reasoning of Evidence There were widespread flaws and contradictions in the collection of two of the prosecution's witnesses, who were husband and wife. The prosecution's second witness was the cousin of the aforementioned prosecution witnesses, and an interesting witness was whether the defendant entered the home when everyone was sleeping or talking or whether he had been raped by a prosecution witness or someone else. But on the basis of their unreliable evidence, no estimate will be made. Neither the medical report nor the chemical report confirmed the prosecution's case and the conviction and sentence of the culprits were set aside and released. Was, in the circumstances, \ r \ n \ r \ n criminal advocate from Alipur lawyer