The testimony of the accused in section 10 (3) was specifically requested by two, the false interference by his cousin / complainant with whom the accused had business dispute; The investigating officer proved the hostility between the accused and the complainant true. According to the complaint filed by the complainant in the FIR, there were two eyewitnesses to the adultery, but none was presented by the prosecution; the defense plea along with the prosecution case was not to be considered, Which, beyond any doubt, was to be proved, however, if the defendant succeeded in casting doubt on the credibility of the prosecution case, the trial court's finding of the evidence on record should have acquitted the accused, misleading, The gross misrepresentation of fraudulent and inaccurate evidence was the trial court's decision there. Was set aside and the accused ordered to be released
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
