ALI AHMAD versus STATE
Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), 5 342 Definitions of Evidence After the termination of the prosecution case, after the trial of the accused, the statements of all the accused were recorded under Section 342 CCPC. The questions and convictions of the accused were exactly what the trial court found guilty of kidnapping and committing rape, and sentenced to life imprisonment, where the trial court verbally answered all the questions. Were, therefore, held to the conclusion that the trial court unlawful, judicial misconduct and the disclosure of the mandatory provisions of Section 2342 CR P Violated, requiring a separate investigation of each of the accused and independently dismissed the sentence imposed by the Federal Shariat Court. The trial court allowed the appellant in the circumstances, because there were too many defects in the prosecution case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Mohmand lawyer