Find a Lawyer

TAHIR SARWAR ALIAS SHAHAB versus STATE

Section 302 (b) / 34 Definition of Evidence The dead body of the deceased was not recovered and whether he was still alive. Nowhere in the entire record of the matter was it found that the time when the deceased was thrown into the canal was not mentioned, nor was it mentioned whether it was night. Or the night car in which the body was taken was not presented. About 1 year and 8 months after the Supreme Court order and thereafter on the statement made by the new complainant, which, at best, is considered a supplementary statement, The case was not suspected - the overall effect of withdrawing the case by the complainant, against the accused, negotiating a settlement, as well as the elements of physical harassment and defamation, greatly affected the trial case. Many of the incidents used to be broken were mostly made by independent witnesses, while others did not express confidence that the statements of the witnesses were either contradictory. It was unnatural to point out that he was ambiguous or unaware of his prosecution: and it was unbelievable that the deceased was taken to a car to be towed from a busy area to the E Nahr, where the traffic was very high for 24 hours. The stream was still flowing, yet the suspects did not get scared to get there and that someone on the way would see them, even in the canal they could get out dead. The body was successfully dumped in the canal where various agencies' offices are located and they are working. There is no explanation given by the prosecution why no one was involved in their investigation. immigration advocates email from Hassan Abdal lawyer