Find a Lawyer

JEHANGIR versus STATE

Sections 324, 334, 337F (I} & 452 Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), 5 10 Validate the evidence before the Investigation Officer declared two of the defendants innocent, but Subsequently, the night of the trial was conducted with other people. The trial court was not convinced that there was complete darkness on the night of the incident or when the crime was committed, there was no electric light in and around the premises until, according to the records, there was no ambiguity yet. ? Several crime commissioners were concerned about the eye witnesses played their part in the truth, each of the accused played their part in the commission of the crime, and then briefly briefed the events that followed. The complainant, the three injured lawyer prosecutor's witnesses, and the alleged kidnapper, fully testified to the prosecutor's story and, despite a lengthy investigation by the defense, were irreparable or the commission of the crime found discrepancies. The accused prosecution case was established by the medical evidence of the injured persons to abduct the abductor Was linked to the weapons used by KK Medical and Chemical Report and the defendant's strength of the trial without a doubt fully supported his statement, due to the delay in the background, through the trial, the FI In filing the R, the perpetrator was a crime and the accused was sentenced, it was maintained that the conviction would go on at once and they would also be entitled to the benefit. Section 382 8, CR PC tax advocates from Mastoi lawyer