Find a Lawyer

KHAVIND BUX versus STATE

Testimony of Sections 10 (2) and 13 Evidence of the benefit of the doubt The evidence on the record proved that the female accused was a helpless woman at the mercy of a gang of criminals and it cannot be ruled out that she was a compulsor. Became devices. In the circumstances of his close relations and in the hands of strangers risking his life, it cannot be said in the circumstances that the intention of section 10 (2) of the offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) was deliberate with anyone. Was sexually assaulted. 1979 The lady was entitled to benefit from the doubt, she was sentenced by the trial court and her appeal against the sentence was accepted because she needed to be sentenced in a criminal case, the prosecution failed to prove. That the male accused had sold to the woman was considered under Section 13 of the Adultery of the Crime (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 and received money to consider the accused had engaged in illicit intercourse or any illegal and illegal The woman was sold to the accused for moral purpose, her appeal against punishment and punishment was also accepted and both the accused were released. Was instructed online advocate from Karachi lawyer