AMANULLAH versus STATE
Section 10 (4) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the preliminary report of the definition of evidence was filed immediately, the two accused had committed additional judicial confession before the prosecution witnesses, the accused on the said statement. One of his blood-stained shirt was recovered. His indictment also recovered the accused and arms / theft even though it was not witnessed, but the evidence of the circumstances was strong enough that he completely dismissed the accused's theory of innocence and without a doubt. The suspicion was the cause of their crime. The witnesses were permanent in this regard and yet no investigation could be made which could in any way be in favor of defense. The testimony of the prosecutor to whom the confessional statements were made was reliable. That the witness was not inconsistent at any point in his cross examination, nor had any motive for extra-judicial confession against the accused on the charge of wrongdoing, confirming the recovery of two blood-stained knives. Even the retreat, whether judicial or extra-judicial, is, by law, the sole basis for punishing its creator. In Azir's cases, if the court is satisfied that it was indeed made and he believes that without torture, it is true, the post-mortem report of repression or greed reveals that the victim was abused and He died of a strangled knee, none of the police officers, including police officials, had proven guilt on his gesture, accusing him of any misconduct, illicit desire or hatred. Falsely involved in the hate crime against them
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kala Bagh lawyer