Find a Lawyer

ADEEL FAIZ versus STATE

Section 392 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Sections 17 (3) and 24 Judicial Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Sections 2 (b), 12 and 13 \ Definition of FIR I did not name the child's accused and the identity was not paraded, no Kalashnikovs or other weapons, ID cards or cash were recovered from the accused persons, Section 161, none of the accused under CRPC. Neither statement was recorded. Although it was reported that when a jeep was crossing a stolen vehicle, one of the suspects jumped from the undercarriage and fled and was injured by a fire, there is no evidence of anyone operating the jeep or sitting in it. No evidence has been made. A prosecution witness said that no recovery witness's signature was found and he did not remember the time of the arrest of the accused and how long he was in custody. The police officer who was the Ound Prosecution witness did not remember how long the accused remained in police custody; the cumulative effect of such deficiencies, contradictions and errors in the evidence and procedure must have paved the way for the prosecution's fate. Took advantage of the doubt and accepted his appeals even otherwise the accused is accused of having a child within the meaning of Section 2 (b) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, who was not 18 years old, Juanil could not be sentenced to severe imprisonment for the apparent violation of section 12 of the Justices. The system ordinance, 2000, accepting appeals filed by the accused, was set aside for the release of the guilty verdicts. \ R \ n best law firm from Noor kot lawyer