Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab — Judgments of 1989
181 reported judgments of the Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab from 1989 — page 2 of 2.
- MECHANISED CONSTRUCTION OF PAKISTAN I-TD v. MUHAMMAD MUNIR RANA 1989 PLC(CS) 643
For more than 3 years due to a complaint filed for applications before the Authority under the Wages Payment Act 1936, sections 15 and 17 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), section…
- HABIB BANK LTD. v. JAVED IQBAL 1989 PLC(CS) 644
Habib Bank Limited (Staff) Service Rules 1981 Rr 6 (f) (d) and 37 Service Dismissal Comes to Cashier II Category II Authority, Senior Executive Vice President Executive Vice President to Dismiss Categ…
- MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, HAFIZABAD v. MUNAWAR TAHIR 1989 PLC(CS) 646
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 1 (4) and Section O15 (3) (a) The Municipal Committee constituted under the Punjab Local Government Ordinanc…
- MESSRS K.S.B. PUMPS CO. LTD. v. GHULAM SUGHRA 1989 PLC(CS) 648
Section 10, 12 (2) and 30 of the West Pakistan Workmen's Compensation Rules, 1961, R41 Compensation Principal and the Contractor, who is responsible for the compensation, shall pay both the parties to…
- M. SHAMIM RAIDER v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE 1989 PLC(CS) 649
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 34 Limitations No restrictions can be applied for application under Loch Section 34 but can be brought within a reasonable time. A rule needs to be presente…
- JAMAN MASIH v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GUJRANWALA 1989 PLC(CS) 651
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) The Municipal Committee Employee filed a complaint against the termination of the employee stating that he was a regular employee with 20 years…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN v. RAZIQ BAKHSH 1989 PLC(CS) 653
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 36 and 38 of the Appeal Stage were raised in a written statement regarding the legal jurisdiction of the territorial jurisdiction but the Labor Co…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS,WORKSHOP DIVISION, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD INAM ELAHI 1989 PLC(CS) 654
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 25 waits for a workman's order, such an order can be granted for a very short period of time to manage the employee on duty and may not be a labor court…
- MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, RAWALPINDI 1989 PLC(CS) 655
The allowance mileage allowance covered by the Pakistan Railway Personal Manual R 5 (d) & (g) R 5 (d) is calculated by default mail in lieu of overtime railway employees. Can't claim overtime. In addi…
- MANAGING DIRECTOR, HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION, KARACHI v. MUBARIK ALI WATTOO 1989 PLC(CS) 657
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A&38 (3) Benefits behind reinstatement The charge of the workman increased but there was no inquiry when the charge sheet dismissed the job on the basis o…
- Messrs RAFHAN MAIZE PRODUCTS COMPANY LTD., FAISALABAD v. TALIB HUSSAIN 1989 PLC(CS) 662
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Articles 25A & 38 {3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968) Section 0 12 Complaints against termination of se…
- M.SALEEM RAZA v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD., KARACHI 1989 PLC(CS) 663
Section 2 (xxviii) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968); has been given. Because the bank did not apply to the employees, the Labor Court had no…
- AKHTAR ALI v. DISTRICT MANAGER, PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,KOT LAKHPAT DEPOT, LAHORE 1989 PLC(CS) 665
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Employees' Request for Complaint Against Termination Not Submitted to Employee Inquiry Notice Proved Employee Was Not Responsible for Previous Inquiry Ag…
- SAEED AKHTAR SHAH v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED 1989 PLC(CS) 666
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Application for a Job Complaint against a Termination of Employment in Coffee which relates to the preparation of the Round Figure Debt Advice of Coffee …
- MUHAMMAD TARIQ v. THE CONTROLLER AND THE SUPERINTENDENT, GOVERNMENTPRINTING PRESS, LAHORE 1989 PLC(CS) 671
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Complaint against dismissal of employees was processed without inquiry to dismiss the benefits of dismissal of employees by dismissal effect by…
- Mst. BALQEES BIBI v. BALDIA, OKARA 1989 PLC(CS) 673
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Complaint against dismissal is effective on the recommendation of the Selection Committee where it was unnecessary to send the matter to the Selection Bo…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD ANWAR, CONDUCTOR DC-90 1989 PLC(CS) 674
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Application of a Complaint Employee lags behind benefits in the event of his rehabilitation to the employee Employer Impact Such proposal accepted by the…
- INDEPENDENT NEWS CORPORATION LIMITED v. MANZOOR AHMAD 1989 PLC(CS) 676
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Dismissed on charges of mismanagement, a person found in possession of a weekly magazine was brought in possession of a weekly magazine which was still t…
- SIDDIQ AKBAR v. PRESIDENT, HABIB BANK Ltd., KARACHI 1989 PLC(CS) 680
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) A charge sheet was filed on the bank employee's complaint request for dismissal on misconduct, but the order of dismissal of the accused was no…
- RAFIQUE MASIH v. CHAIRMAN, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, CHICHAWATNI 1989 PLC(CS) 682
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 0 12 (3) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A & 38 (3) Termination of Service The Cle…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, RAWALPINDI v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 1989 PLC(CS) 683
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Articles 25A & 38 (3) Appeals of Complaints Many of the objections to the facts raised in the preliminary as well as the written statement but not answered by the L…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE v. BASHIR AHMAD CHEEMA 1989 PLC(CS) 684
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Articles 25A & 38 (3) The objection in the written statement on the complaint request that the petitioner was not a Labor Court decision of the Labor Court without …
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD SADIQ 1989 PLC(CS) 685
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 SC Session 25A, 36, 38 (3) of the complaint regarding the evidence of being reinstated as a rehabilitation applicant is that the employee was temporarily employ…
- DILDAR HUSSAIN v. GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 1989 PLC(CS) 686
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A, 34 and 38 (3) Application under section 34 No limitation The Labor Court termed such request as time-barred, as it was pending the Labor Court's decisi…
- MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK Ltd. v. AKBAR ALI 1989 PLC(CS) 687
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 37 Wage Commission Award Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Written jurisdiction over the High Court under the jurisdiction of the Labor Cou…
- POST MASTER GENERAL, CENTRAL CIRCLE, LAHORE v. ALI SHER KHAN 1989 PLC(CS) 688
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974) Section 2 (b) (iii) Workers' Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), Section 2 (a) and Schedule 11, CI (xiii) Factori…
- Hafiz AMANAT ALI v. GHAZANFAR ALI, DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION) L.DA. 1989 PLC(CS) 690
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 S 38 (5) According to the court's direction of inquiry into the tribunal effect, the completion of the latest investigation in this regard was presented to the empl…
- BASHIR AHMAD v. ZONAL CHIEF, PUNJAB PROVINCIAL Co-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., D.G. KHAN 1989 PLC(CS) 705
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A&38 (3) Complaint against dismissal of employment when absent from duty The application for leave of the employee who applied for the employee's leave wa…
- THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. HAKIM ALI KHAN 1989 PLC(CS) 707
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Pakistan Railway Establishment Code, Volume 1, R707 (5) Pakistan Railway Gazette No 12, Dated 15 6 1987, Item No 41 Leave Preparation for Retir…
- ABDUL HAMID KHAWAR v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION 1989 PLC(CS) 708
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Road Transport Corporation Services employees were terminated on the basis of a 1969 settlement, assuming that all vacancies in the subordinate…
- THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD SHAM 1989 PLC(CS) 709
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3) Pakistan Railway Establishment Code, Vol. I, R707 (5) Pakistan Railway Gazette No.12 Portion 75 a> 1987, Item No. 41 to be a part of the allowance fo…
- ZILLA COUNCIL, SARGODHA v. Rana MUHAMMAD HAFI 1989 PLC(CS) 711
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) To the extent of an employee's appeal request to be regularly accepted by the employer from the date specified by the employer on the complaint…
- THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. MAQBOOL AHMED 1989 PLC(CS) 713
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) A complaint against a fine was not made in the presence of the employee before any domestic inquiry fines were imposed but the fact is that the…
- PAKISTAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MOTELS (N), RAWALPINDI v. MUHAMMAD ASGHAR KHAN 1989 PLC(CS) 714
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Investigating a complaint for dismissal request for misconduct found that the alleged charge was not supported by the evidence presented before…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, PESHAWAR v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE 1989 PLC(CS) 718
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 Appeal Limit Appeal For Copy Of An Extraordinary Order Filed After The Appeal Limit Expires Deadline For Appeal Retained By This Clerk Of Court Evidence …
- NASIR KHAN v. DEPUTY POSTMASTER GENERAL 1989 PLC(CS) 725
Section 25A & 38 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, Limitation Act (LA 1908), Section 14 grievance petition, which operates without jurisdiction, will be excluded, the complaint was reque…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN v. SHAMSUR RAHIM 1989 PLC(CS) 747
Paid Railway Officers Manual Volume I, Section III, Para 5 (k) Terms \ Basic Salary \ and \ Pads \ Various Basic Salary may not include allowance for Holiday Workers for Holiday Workers ?…
- SHAMSUR RAHIM v. MUAMMAD HANIF 1989 PLC(CS) 749
Section 15 and 17 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section O15 (l) (i) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), sectio…
- PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. QURBAN ALI 1989 PLC(CS) 750
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Courts jurisdiction MLO 58 Punjab Urban Transport Corporation, an establishment administered by the Federal Government, therefore, under scruti…
- KHUSHI MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR, PRESIDENT, PUNJAB IRRIGATIONEMPLOYEES FEDERATION v. REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, PUNJAB 1989 PLC(CS) 757
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 10 and 38 (3a) of the Trade Union Adventum Stake Order officials have been accused of allegedly calling for the resignation of the Federation of Officers a…
- SHAKIR HABIB v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, LAHORE 1989 PLC(CS) 758
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Payment of Wages Act (Fourth of 1936) Section 15 (2) Applicant's request for payment of wages by the Wage Payment Authority under territorial …
- RAWAL HOTEL LTD. v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 1989 PLC(CS) 825
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 36, 37 and 38 (3A) Practices and Procedures Appeal Reviewing the absence of the party not appearing on such date and dismissing the application as def…
- MUHAMMAD SALMAN KHURSHID v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN 1989 PLC(CS) 826
Sections 25A, 36 and 38 (3A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 were withdrawn with permission to update the application of practice and procedural evidence complaints. The second application …
- MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. AGRICULTURAL ENGINEER, GUJRANWALA 1989 PLC(CS) 831
The Labor Court, set aside in the appeal under these circumstances, would have the full benefit of the restoration of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3).…
- POST MASTER GENERAL NORTHERN CIRCLE RAWALPINDI v. MUHAMMAD NAZIR BHATTI 1989 PLC(CS) 832
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 Limitation Act (1X of 1918), clarification regarding section 5 appeal limitation delay, affirmed in his affidavit regarding the delay in dismissing t…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. MUHAMMAD ILYAS 1989 PLC(CS) 836
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) The order exceeding the request for complaints has been challenged in the appeal of the department and such appeal has not yet been decided, th…
- HABIB BANK LTD. v. SAFEER AHMAD 1989 PLC(CS) 837
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) First Wage Commission Award, paragraphs 258 (4), (5) and 6 (c) Provision of the National Bank Employee without charge sheet and inquiry and oth…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE 1989 PLC(CS) 877
Section 15 (1) of the Payments Act 1936 under the Territorial Jurisdiction Authority Act does not cover the applicant's residence, the area where the wages were deducted or the applicants claim that t…
- MUHAMMAD SAEED v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. 1989 PLC(CS) 879
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 Appeal Range Satisfactory decision / Labor court order passed on the due date, for which the parties did not receive any notice and without hearing the e…
- ASHFAQ AHMED BAJWA v. UNITED BANK LTD., KARACHI 1989 PLC(CS) 881
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 37 & 38 Review Tribunal Has No Option To Review Appellate Tribunal Decides Appeal Of Bank Employee On The basis that Labor Court And Tribunal Has No Jurisd…
- PIONEER STEEL MILLS LTD. v. MUHAMMAD ALI 1989 PLC(CS) 882
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) in a complaint against dismissal for misconduct alleges that two workers argued with each other during work hours, resulting in breach of d…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE v. ABDUL HAMID 1989 PLC(CS) 883
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Notice of a Complaint is that in the complaint notice it should have been said that the appeal of the department is preferred and the result is not state…
- DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION, LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. JALIL TARIQ 1989 PLC(CS) 884
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Employee of Lahore Development Authority accused of committing misconduct of habitual late habits that could not remove such employees from emp…
- Rana JAVED ISLAM v. HYESONS SUGAR MILLS LTD. 1989 PLC(CS) 886
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O, Season Workers left behind at the end of season 1, 2 and 2 have the right to report for duty within 10 da…
- ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (A & B) PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. ABDUL MAJID 1989 PLC(CS) 888
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (viii), 25A & 38 (3) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (1) (B) (iii) Worker Civil Employees Complaint filed with Statistical Inspector of Pakis…
- MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE 1989 PLC(CS) 891
Railway Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules 1975 R 5 (l) suspension was held every three months, sending notification to the suspended employee, it was not necessary that the suspension be term…
- KHADIM HUSSAIN v. CLIMAX ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. 1989 PLC(CS) 892
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Request for Complaint The petition filed by the Advocate Petitioner appeared for the first time when the limitation period expired when the app…
- PRESIDENT AND GENERAL SECRETARY, LAHORE ZOO MAZDOOR UNION (Regd.) v. CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS 1989 PLC(CS) 901
Temporary Pairing and Interpersonal Orders of Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX A XXXX, Rr 1 and 2 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25A & 38 (3a) Advertising Interim Settlement …
- MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. MANAGING DIRECTOR ITTEHAD CHEMICALS 1989 PLC(CS) 902
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A Medical evidence regarding age is always approximate and can be accepted if no evidence is available in the form of a birth date or school leaving certi…
- PERSONNEL MANAGER, PATTOKI SUGAR MILLS, KASUR v. Soofi MUHAMMAD SADIQ 1989 PLC(CS) 904
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 36 Legal Objection to the Complaint Request Procedure The Labor Court accepted the evidence laid down by the appellate tribunal without inviting the e…
- KOHINOOR TEXTILE MILLS v. ALLAH DAD 1989 PLC(CS) 908
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 36 and 38 (3) Applicants of Complaint Reject the timely service of complaint notice to the Labor Court as a controversial Labor Court, dismissing the …
- MUHAMMAD SULEMAN MALIK v. FACTORY MANAGER, LEVER BROTHERS (PAK) LTD. 1989 PLC(CS) 909
Bonus Claim Bonus for application before West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O10C Salary Payment Act (IV) 9/36), Section 15 (2). Payment will be…
- KOHINOOR TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. ABDUL WAHID 1989 PLC(CS) 912
Articles 25A, 37 and 38 (3A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Upgrade order of the Labor Court, a hearing order with permission to withdraw the application was not approved under section 25A…
- KOHINOOR TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. MUHAMMAD SALEEM 1989 PLC(CS) 913
Sections 25A, 37 and 38 (3A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, with the approval of the Labor Court's Appeal Review Order, the withdrawal of the complaint was not a decision under Section 25…
- AHMAD BAKHSH v. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, D.G. KHAN 1989 PLC(CS) 915
Effective trolleyman was replaced as a Gangmowan, who will be replaced as a junior with those already working as a Gangmowan. To those who are already working, this will not affect the rights of the p…
- MUBARAK ALI BASHIR 1989 PLC(CS) 916
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 2 (i) Worker salesman of a tea company whose duty was primarily to distribute, sell and sell, and to have so…
- EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, OKARA v. TAJ MUHAMMAD 1989 PLC(CS) 919
Section 17 (1) (b) of the Payment of Salary Act 1936, if the appeal with the certificate of authority on the memo appealed does not lie that the appellant was competent under the immovable order of th…
- MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. METROPOLITAN CORPORATION, LAHORE 1989 PLC(CS) 921
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A & 38 (3) of the Retirement Act, mandatory re…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN v. KHUDA BUKSH 1989 PLC(CS) 922
Article 37 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, the condominium of the appeal threshold in which the Labor Court's decree did not declare a fixed date for this purpose and it was announced afte…
- GHULAM SHABBIR v. GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 1989 PLC(CS) 940
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Timely notice of complaint of restriction of notice of complaint not later than the date, no explanation for the delay nor due to request, has …
- AKBAR ALI v. MUKHTAR AHMAD 14ASHMI OWNER FAREED BUS SERVICE 1989 PLC(CS) 941
The Salary Payment Act 1936 Section 2 (7) Road transport service word does not necessarily mean multiple plying of vehicles does not mean that the provisions of the Act were not applicable to just one…
- HABIB BANK LTD. v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN 1989 PLC(CS) 942
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Complaint Against Dismissal Request for Dismissal Recovery Opportunity Be entitled to Return Benefits Article approved by the Proceedings and Authorizati…
- MAQSOOD v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SARGODHA 1989 PLC(CS) 946
Sections 25A, 36 and 38 (, 3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 will decide the special points without giving the applicant the opportunity to present evidence Because the applicant does not …
- MUHAMMAD BAKHSH SIDDIQUE v. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MESCO DIVISION, WAPDA, MULTAN 1989 PLC(CS) 947
The provisions of the law are applicable only under the provisions of the Pakistan Essential Services (Rehabilitation) Act 1952 Section 1 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25R ju…
- Malik BABOO KHAN OWNER AND OCCUPIER, TOOR SIZING INDUSTRIES, FAISALABAD v. TAJAMAL HUSSAIN SHAH 1989 PLC(CS) 948
Salary Payment Act 1936 Section 17 Authority Order, Appeal against Order of Money Order by Authority Deposit 11 was directed by the Pay Order Authority Deposit, Section 17 was sufficient compliance.…
- ITTEHAD CHEMICALS v. Rana MUKHATAR AHMAD 1989 PLC(CS) 951
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii), Exception (b) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 2 (i) Worker / Employee Supe…
- ZULFIOAR ALI v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN Through S.E. Civil Circle, Pak. P.W.D., Lahore 1989 PLC(CS) 953
The Labor Court issued a decree issued by the National Industrial Relations Commission Case, sections 22A (8) (G), 25A, 25A (8) (A) (B) and 38 (3A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969. Transfer…
- MUSHTAQ BEGUM v. XEN, IRRIGATION WAPDA TUBEWELL OPERATION DIVISION, KOT ADU 1989 PLC(CS) 955
Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 Section 10 and 30 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Claim Compensation Claim Completion Claim Claim to the Commissioner is not raised in a written statement in the context t…
- DIVISIONAL MECHANICAL ENIGNEER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, RAWALPINDI v. Syed LIAOUAT HUSSAIN SHAH 1989 PLC(CS) 956
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Notice of Complaint and Submission of Railway Employees Absent and Retired Orders Remaining relaxation order has been accepted in the case, whi…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE v. RUKAN DIN 1989 PLC(CS) 959
Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 Sections 10 and 30 provide the compensation amount of Rs. 15,000 at the time of the accident, but the amendment is subsequently allowed to pay Rs. 30,000 at the time of…
- MAZDOOR ITTEHAD UNION MAHMOOD TEXTILE MILLS LTD v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, DERA GHAZI KHAN REGION 1989 PLC(CS) 960
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 7 (2) (a) (B) and 38 (3) The legal requirement for the registration of a trade union is a prerequisite for the registration of a trade union. A fifth of th…
Other years — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 1999 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.