Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab — Judgments of 1988
74 reported judgments of the Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab from 1988.
- MUHAMMAD SARWAR SHAKIR v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BAHAWALPUR 1988 PLC 481
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 0 15 (4) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25 A & 38 (3) The Indemnity Charge Sheet i…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. SHABBIR HUSSAIN SHAH 1988 PLC 482
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 39 (2) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), direct recruitment of Road Transport Corporation i…
- GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE v. QAZI ALI RAZA 1988 PLC 484
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25, Denied for misuse of misconduct Refuses to disclose fare without ticket issuance on bus conductor. Noting that the accused was confronted with passenger…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. ABDUL AZIZ 1988 PLC 485
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Complaint Notice Dates, Complaints Begins To Date Employees Claim Promoting With Effective Impact Representation Rejected By Authorized Authority, Due To…
- PARAS TEXTILE MILLS LTD., BAHAWALPUR v. Hafiz KHADIM HUSSAIN 1988 PLC 487
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 15 (2) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A & 38 (3) of mismanagement, the concept of…
- WYETH LABORATORIES (PAKISTAN) LTD v. SHAUKAT JAVED 1988 PLC 488
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A and 38 (3) Specific times of industrial dispute work The parties are bound by either the service agreement or the rules under which the service was off…
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. SENIOR PERSONNEL MANAGER, F.F.C.LTD RAWALPINDI 1988 PLC 490
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 2 (c) Section 0 15 (4), Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A38 (3) Issuing Terminatio…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN v. EJAZ AHMAD KHAN 1988 PLC 492
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Complaint / Appeal The challenge of the Luxury Standing Order of the Labor Court was challenged before the Appellate Tribunal on the ground tha…
- AGRICULTURAL ENGINEER, BAHAWALPUR v. ABDUL HAMID 1988 PLC 493
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 36 and 38 (3) Appeals from the Labor Court for Evidence by the Labor Court Against Termination of Corruption In the case of the applicant, the evidenc…
- EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CBDC, LAHORE DIVISION v. KARAM DIN 1988 PLC 494
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 End of Appeal Delay There was no room for condolences on the long-delayed provision of necessary documents to the Advocate through the Employment Establi…
- DIRECTOR (FINANCE), PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. ALI AHMAD 1988 PLC 495
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 AG 38 (3) Complaint against the retired worker of Road Transport Board retired at the age of 55 but extension and service for all employees of Punjab Roa…
- PROJECT DIRECTOR, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, LALAMUSA v. NIAZ ALI 1988 PLC 498
Corruption In consultation with a doctor and obtaining a medical certificate without obtaining a doctor, there is no misconduct in the Punjab Civil Servants (Eligibility and Discipline) Rules, 1975, R…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, RAWALPINDI v. NOOR KHAN 1988 PLC 500
Approval of payment of wages if Article 15 (2) of 1936 and 17 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), section 38 (3a) jurisdiction to grant to the Authority under the Payment of Payment…
- SADIQ MASIH v. MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, MIAN CHANNU 1988 PLC 501
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 12 (2) Request for a copy of the order limit shall be dismissed. , Held, will be excluded for restriction purposes…
- SANAULLAH JAHANGIR SHEIKH v. VICE-PRESIDENT, ZONAL OFFICE, UNITED BANK LTD., SIALKOT 1988 PLC 502
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Transitional Transition Establishment Challenges Bank Employee Mobility Finance Request Transfer Order, As usual, the notice of complaint was …
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. ABDUL SHAKOOR 1988 PLC 504
Punjab Road Transport Service Rules 1976 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25A & 38 (3) Post of the Assistant Depot Superintendent on Traffic Cadre and under the 1976 Rules of t…
- HALEEMA BIBI v. Ch. MANZOOR AHMAD, PRCPRIETOR NEWS AGENCY, BAHAWALNAGAR 1988 PLC 505
Section 2 (n), 10 and 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, can never be decided without the opportunity of evidence on the question of fact whether the employee is an employee or not. Can be do…
- PROVINCE OF PUNJAB v. MUHAMMAD IFTIKHAR 1988 PLC 507
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A&38 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 1 (4), Prodiso (L) Government Employees (Per…
- JAVAID AHMED v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION 1988 PLC 509
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Denial of Industrial Controversy for Misconduct That TT40 Did Not Arise on the Occasion but Later in the Office…
- MUZAFFAR ALI GONDAL v. PROGRESSIVE PAPERS LIMITED 1988 PLC 511
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Ss 25 A & 38 (3) Workers' benefit to the lower court, which has remained unemployed since being removed from their post, has been unannounced in cross-examination. …
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS LAHORE v. NIAMAT ALI 1988 PLC 512
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) High Pay Scale, Acting as Railway Gangman's Main Claim, Cayman Klemm's Pay Scale Claims that Salary Plaintiffs During Complaint Petitions It ha…
- DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, FAISALABAD v. NAZIR AHMAD 1988 PLC 513
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and a Complaint Against 25 Retirement Applicants challenged the Retirement Notice before it was actually retired that the applicant in the ap…
- QAMAR ABBAS SHAH v. MUHAMMAD KHALID G.E.(A) SOUTH, M.E.S., LAHORE 1988 PLC 516
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (5) Against the Transfer Order Disapproving the Labor Court's Interim Establishment Order, then allowing Duty…
- ABDUL HAKEEM v. GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE JNANG ETC. 1988 PLC 517
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3a) Request for Review Complaint Against False Reversal Appeal for interim stay order dismissed on wrong grounds; Appeal tribunal upheld by the La…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. MUHAMMAD RAFIQ 1988 PLC 518
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 0 1 Replacement Worker Permanent Worker Appointed due to the temporary absence of a replacement permanent wo…
- CRESCENT JUTE PRODUCTS LTD. v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 1988 PLC 519
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Articles 25A & 38 (3) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Delay in Section 14 Complaint Demands Delay in Labor Court Second Complaint Notice Delayed Suitable for a modifie…
- PROPRIETOR TAHIR SOAP FACTORY FAISALABAD v. BASHIR AHMAD 1988 PLC 522
Workers' Compensation Act 1923 Section 30, Appeal against the Commissioner's Limitation Order, Delaying the delay of each day must be considered satisfactory after the passage of time by the responden…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. HAQ NAWAZ 1988 PLC 523
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 S8 25 A & 38 (3) Complaint against dismissal for absence of more than 10 days And the accused did not provide the opportunity. Reproducing evidence to the Labor Cou…
- MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION, MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MULTAN 1988 PLC 544
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (5) Whether or not a breach of a grievance order passed by a labor court allegedly violates an order of stay, if a complaint has been made against the or…
- PERSONNEL MANAGER, FLORA TEXTILES LTD., KHURIANWALA v. MAJID 1988 PLC 545
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A (9) a 38 (3a) Against a Labor Court Complaint Order, the Labor Court brought the Labor Court up to a fixed period under the Labor Court Complaint Order …
- CHAIRMAN, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE; TOBA TEK SINGH v. YOUNAS MASIH 1988 PLC 547
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A and 36 Procedures and Procedures Requesting a Complaint Against an Order Removing the Employee Service Chairman of the Municipal Committee, the Municip…
- MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. DISTRICT MANAGER 1988 PLC 550
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Promotional Appellant Claims Progress Before Advancement Of A Co-Worker, Respondent No.2, Applicant Appeal By Sentencing Respondent No.2 Was r…
- UNITED BANK LTD., KARACHI v. ASHFAQ AHMAD BAJWA 1988 PLC 551
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 Appeals Against the Labor Court's Decision That the Memorandum signed by the Appellant was not purely a legal question but a mixed question of fact and l…
- TOWN COMMITTEE, KHARIAN v. REHMAT BIBI 1988 PLC 554
Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 Section 30 Compensation for loss of life The employee's death was allegedly due to an accident while on account of an alleged illness caused by an opposing party's Orde…
- GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, v. BASHIR AHMAD 1988 PLC 555
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Articles 25A, 36 and 38 (3A) Practices and Procedures for Separation of Ex-Procedures Courts do not adopt a rigid view on petitions to set aside ex-proceedings wher…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF 1988 PLC 557
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Complaint against termination of service Railway employee (Mason) was initially appointed as substitute for his father, who went on medical lea…
- SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WAPDA v. NAZAKAT HUSSAIN SHAH 1988 PLC 559
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Worker's Payment Worker Suspended and Restored Labor Court ordered the employer to pay its legal obligations, but the employer is of the view t…
- MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD., BAHAWALPUR v. MAZHAR ABBAS GARDEZI 1988 PLC 560
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) 5 or 25% of the jurisdiction of the Labor Court or the punishment for such punishment was committed by the employer, if it is known that the La…
- MUHAMMAD USMAN v. UNITED BANK LTD., KARACHI 1988 PLC 562
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 An appellate labor court concluded that the appellant was not included in the definition of the worker in accordance with the judgment of the High Court …
- KHAN MUHAMMAD v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through General 1988 PLC 563
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Requirements for Adult Interim Establishment Applicants are seeking ad interim at the junction against the lower-level transfer order, in favor of a loss…
- WADI HUSSAIN v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD, LAHORE 1988 PLC 573
Complaints submitted by Advocate Petition for restriction of time spent in other proceedings under Section 25A & 38 (3), Limitation Act (IX of 1998), Section 14 (2) of the Industrial Relations Ordinan…
- TOWN COMMITTEE, QILA DIDAR SINGH v. MUHAMMAD AYUB 1988 PLC 575
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Complaint Requests Applicants of the Appellant Town Committee's Octroi Branch perform the legal duties of dismissing, receiving and receiving taxpayers o…
- GENERAL SECRETARY, DOABA :ICE MILLS WORKERS UNION v. REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, PUNJAB 1988 PLC 577
Contrary to the provisions of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, sections 22 (3) (b), 62 and 38 (3a) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, VII of 1898, Section 200 Trial 22 (3) (b). Registrar…
- Syed MUSAWWAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. DIRECTOR AGRICULTURAL MECHANISATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE, MULTAN 1988 PLC 578
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Transfer Aid Transfer Establishment Orders Transfer Transfer Transfer to the Office of the Trade Union Office Responsible Transfer does not in…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SAHIWAL v. MUHAMMAD KHALIL 1988 PLC 579
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Domestic Inquiry Bus Conductor Case Ticket to be charged without receiving passenger fare The checker does not witness the receipt of fare, it cannot be …
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, DINA through its Chairman 1988 PLC 580
The provisions of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, the duties of hearing a request for a complaint regarding the practice and procedure being legal, the return of the petition, without the jur…
- UNION FOUNDRY and STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS v. MUNIR AHMAD 1988 PLC 581
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) The previous benefits of reinstatement are not awarded and do not say for the worker to compensate the outstanding employee and to dismiss him …
- HADAIT ALI v. MANAGER, GOVERNMENT JALLO ROZAN FACTORY 1988 PLC 582
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Notice of Disclaimer Complaint and Request Complaint Notice and Request Refusal CT duty was not restricted based on the date of dismissal, on t…
- COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LTD., ISLAMABAD v. GHULAM MUHAMMAD 1988 PLC 584
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) again benefits the recipient of a counter-charge that he sometimes bricks but does not do so regularly: because the applicant only accident…
- AFZAL RIAZ v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION 1988 PLC 586
Sections 25A, 36 and 38 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, dismiss the request for a labor court complaint regarding the question of fact and procedure because such a case is dependable. …
- RASUL SHAH v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 1988 PLC 588
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Domestic Inquiry Railway employees removed from employment due to a train collision were reversed on appeal to reversal post, no formal inquiry…
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT 1988 PLC 589
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 35 and 37 of the Labor Court Order Not Presented…
- MUHAMMAD YAMIN KHAN v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION 1988 PLC 591
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii), 25A & 38 (3) Defining the Labor Person Who Served in the Date of Complaint Appeal Man Labor Labor Jurisdiction Judgment of Labor Court by Labor …
- DIRECTOR (OPERATIONS), PUTC v. RIAZ KHALID 1988 PLC 593
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A38 (3) The Transport Corporation accepts the Prosecution Complaint petition against the reversal of the Superintendent's position in the Labor Court and …
- Syed ASHIQ HUSSAIN SHAH v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD 1988 PLC(CS) 594
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 38 (3A) and 47 Allowance for Termination for Corruption A defense opportunity not available to the employee during a domestic inquiry by the Labor Court wa…
- DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER DUBAI BANK LTD v. UMAR HAYAT 1988 PLC(CS) 595
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 0 11 Industrial Relations, Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A & 38 (3) Service Return Business of Employ…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. NAZIR AHMAD 1988 PLC(CS) 598
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Against the backbone conductor alleges that the fare was obtained without the issuance of the ticket, during the course of checking or inquiry,…
- Malik MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, NIDAI MILLAT LTD 1988 PLC(CS) 599
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 37 and 38 (3A) dismissed the appeal for appeal, hearing of the appeal for redressal of the complaint, although it has not yet been submitted, though t…
- MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. S.E. SCARP I CIRCLE, LAHORE\' 1988 PLC(CS) 601
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) The employer's transfer discretion cannot be successfully challenged unless it can be claimed that the transfer order has been challenged in th…
- Syed NAZIR UL HASNAIN v. GENERAL MANAGER, COTTON TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 1988 PLC(CS) 602
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (5) Complaint for violating the Labor Court Establishment Order It has not been alleged that the order to terminate such officer was passed before …
- MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. DIRECTOR SOIL CONSERVATION (AGRICULTURAL) RAWALPINDI 1988 PLC(CS) 604
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Termination of Wrong Term of Service Against Counter-Termination Since service termination, right-of-way permits were not allowed…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT,. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE v. ABDUL SATTAR KHAN 1988 PLC(CS) 605
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Complaint Delays Demand for Complaint Delay Claims Railway Employees As Recreation Allowance Denied. It …
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. MUHAMMAD YAQOOB 1988 PLC(CS) 606
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii), 25A & 38 (3) will not apply to a person complaining against termination of service and is not under the definition of employees who have bee…
- BASCO ENTERPRISES v. ZAFAR IQBAL 1988 PLC(CS) 608
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Termination of Service Application for leave for indefinite period is not only a reasonable ground employee while involved in a criminal case a…
- SARGROH VEGETABLE GHEE v. MUHAMMAD MUKHTAR KHAN 1988 PLC(CS) 619
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 38 (3) and 49 (3) express permission of the lawyer to engage the lawyer which has been accepted by the court and advised the worker on his expense. Th…
- TARIQ MUKHTAR v. HABIB BANK LTD. 1988 PLC(CS) 626
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii), 25 A&38 (3), jurisdiction of bank employees for failure to read momentarily evidence of labor court inquiry against dismissal of allegations of …
- HABIB BANK LTD. v. GHULAM RASOOL 1988 PLC(CS) 629
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) The wage worker was mistakenly retired but was recalled and placed on duty. Did not perform any duty. The Labor Court accepted the complaint fi…
- LAHORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION v. TAHIR AHMAD 1988 PLC(CS) 630
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Termination of Service Temporary Appointment Against Vacation Vacancy Not Received Permanent Employee on Vacation Benefits Retained by Appellat…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. SIRAJ DIN 1988 PLC(CS) 631
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Complaint Request Service Complaint Notice The controversial Labor Court must record the findings on the Labor Court point order without record…
- HABIB ULLAH KHAN v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION 1988 PLC(CS) 632
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3 a) Payment of Payment Act (IV of 1936), Section 17 was subject to revision exercises and the period of transfer of wages for employment, practice of u…
- MUHAMMAD RAUF BUTT v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE 1988 PLC(CS) 634
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Maintaining a Complaint Request The complaint request, without any evidence and without hearing this case, will be heard requesting the amendme…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION 1988 PLC(CS) 635
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Against Counter-Insurgency Beneficiary The wrong applicant does not say that he / she is suffering from employment after termination of employm…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE v. RAB NAWAZ 1988 PLC(CS) 636
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Transfer of Road Transport Corporation Employee's request that he was the most junior and thus dismissed the transfer order after the Labor Cou…
- HABIB JUTE MILLS LTD.JAUHERABAD v. REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, SARGODHA REGION 1988 PLC(CS) 637
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 10 and 34 cancellation of registration of trade union registrants are only eligible to apply to the Labor Court for the mission so that the competitor who m…
Other years — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 1999 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.