MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE
Section 15 (1) of the Payments Act 1936 under the Territorial Jurisdiction Authority Act does not cover the applicant's residence, the area where the wages were deducted or the applicants claim that the late wages were paid by the territorial jurisdiction. The authority was to appoint an employee of the railway in which a train clerk worked as a guard. The claim relates to the difference between the salary of the train clerk and the guard who was allegedly unpaid, because the claim was brought to the authority over O because the employee was working on the request when the application was made. I was not paid and O was not, would have a territorial jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
