Find a Lawyer

DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ

The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 SC Session 25A, 36, 38 (3) of the complaint regarding the evidence of being reinstated as a rehabilitation applicant is that the employee was temporarily employed from time to time because on a fixed date. No evidence was brought. The tendering of some documents for additional evidence is not allowed and the applicant is considered a permanent worker and the petition accepts re-instruction with back benefits. The Labor Court's decision is exempt from appeal and remand in this case. To allow the employer to produce additional documentation. immigration advocate from Patika lawyer