Find a Lawyer

POST MASTER GENERAL NORTHERN CIRCLE RAWALPINDI versus MUHAMMAD NAZIR BHATTI

The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 Limitation Act (1X of 1918), clarification regarding section 5 appeal limitation delay, affirmed in his affidavit regarding the delay in dismissing the Advocate for obtaining a copy of this decision. Has attempted to contact the appellant. (A government department), but his offer could not be made due to his professional / personal engagement, which the contract denied: the advocate who was only involved in obtaining a copy of the unwanted decision was the agent of the appellant and the appellant. Was responsible for its operations. The appellant was guilty of gross negligence in failing to provide the appellant immediately upon receipt of his copy of the wrong verdict. The appellant was guilty of gross negligence in making no attempt to contact the relevant lawyer. To be cautious and to exercise proper care and caution, it may be said that he did not make such a boner. Such a valuable right was dealt with by the Respondents from time to time, thereby denying good grounds. Could have been done advocate from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer