Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ZILLA COUNCIL, SARGODHA versus RANA MUHAMMAD HAFI


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) To the extent of an employee's appeal request to be regularly accepted by the employer from the date specified by the employer on the complaint request The ban failed to indicate on what date the order regulating the services of the employees was approved and when employees were notified of this, the employees were also unable to identify. Expressed that, first of all, according to regularization of service, employees were paid only because Employees' services were regularized effectively from the due date, it would not be enough to show that there was a time limit for complaint notices and complaints requests when employees were told that they could challenge the regulator from that day. Or the wages were paid according to the complaint notices / complaints requests. There is no time limit under the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Sialkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.