DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, RAWALPINDI versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Articles 25A & 38 (3) Appeals of Complaints Many of the objections to the facts raised in the preliminary as well as the written statement but not answered by the Labor Court do not have the opportunity of leading evidence, the request of the Labor Court Decision to accept, no, after providing the parties with evidence opportunities, the matter was remanded for reconsideration of all disputed points.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
