Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab — Judgments of 1989
181 reported judgments of the Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab from 1989 — page 1 of 2.
- ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, FISHERIES, D.G. KHAN v. HAFIZ AHMAD QURESHI 1989 PLC 28
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Sections 1 (4), Sections OS 1, 12 (3) and 15 (3) (E) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25 A &…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. BARKAT ALI 1989 PLC 30
Articles 15 and 17 of the Wage Payment Act 1936 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 38 (3a) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968…
- AGRICULTURE ENGINEER, TALAGANG v. MUHAMMAD IOBAL 1989 PLC 34
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 1 (4) and Section O15 (3) (e) Rules for the Termination and Disciplinary Establishment of Misconduct Apply t…
- INAYAT ULLAH SHAIKH v. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION, KARACHI 1989 PLC 38
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Complaint Request Canceling Service The Respondent self-administered opinion that during the previous investigation against the employee, all facts wer…
- PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION, KARACHI v. LIAQAT ALI 1989 PLC 41
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Cannot Have Domestic Inquiry Without Charge Sheet Service Charge Sheet Service Dispensary Procedure Not Reasonable, Dismissing An Unlawful Labo…
- MECHANIZED CONSTRUCTION OF PAKISTAN LTD., ISLAMABAD v. MUHAMMAD ANWAR 1989 PLC 46
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Completion of Complaint Request Services Respondent is employed by an appellant firm as an electrician for a particular project and after development no …
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BAHAWALPUR v. GHULAM ABBAS 1989 PLC 49
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 36 and 38 (3A) Exercises and Procedures for Expending Loan Parties Due to the Retirement of the Pre-Presiding Officer of the Labor Court by Appellate …
- ALLAH WASAYA NASIM v. DIRECTOR OPERATION, P.R.T.C. 1989 PLC 52
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 25A&38 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Sectio…
- ZILA COUNCIL, SAHIWAL v. MUHAMMAD YAR 1989 PLC 55
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Temporary Order for Temporary Trial Withholding Case, Balance of Facility and Applicants Risk of Pakistan Labor Cases that cannot be calculate…
- MILLAT TRACTORS LTD. v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHAN 1989 PLC 60
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 37 and 38 Appeal Extra evidence A party who has already sought to present additional evidence as the additional evidence in the possession of the party app…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. IQBAL AKBAR 1989 PLC 63
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Complaint Request Permanent Acting Implementation Officer Guarantee subject to the qualification authority if a senior position requires academ…
- MST. SHAKILA KAUSAR v. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, TELEPHONE SERVICES, RAWALPINDI 1989 PLC 67
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Complaint Notice Request may be made from the authority or the Appellate Authority of the Department which can be considered as the Complaint Notice, the…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHOR v. TARIO ZIA 1989 PLC 74
Pakistan Railway Subsidiary Rules Total X Permanent Route or Works, R 221 Report to the Higher Authority through the Provisioning Station Master that the DTO did not receive information about the trai…
- PATTOKI SUGAR MILLS, POTTOKI v. MUHAMMAD RASHID ABBASI 1989 PLC 92
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 8, 34 and 38 (3A) The selection of union union disputed officials is pending before the Labor Court, before the Labor Court appeals the rival groups to pre…
- THE PUNJAB IRRIGATION TUBEWELL WORKERS UNION SCARP-II (CBA), SARGODHA v. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SCARP-II 1989 PLC 95
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Articles 32 (1A) and 38 (3) specify the multiple demands that industrial disputes do not require for any evidence on the basis that the labor court demands the …
- RANA MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPLIES CORPORATION, SARGODHA REGION, SARGODHA 1989 PLC 98
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Complaints Petition Bank Employee (store supervisor) liable for loss of money due to theft, deposit money to protect himself from criminal pros…
- LABOUR UNION (C.BA.), GOJRA SAMMUNDRI SUGAR MILLS, FAISALABAD v. MAZDOOR ITTEHAD UNION, GOJRA SAMMUNDRI SUGAR MILLS 1989 PLC 99
Articles 8 and 38 (3a) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 have been appealed to the Labor Court by a rival trade registrar's decision against the Registrar's decision that the second trade uni…
- FIAZUDDIN v. LAHORE ARTS COUNCIL 1989 PLC 106
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 2 (b) Commercial Establishment Ar Lahore Arts Council, whether a commercial establishment matter should be d…
- SECRETARY/GENERAL MANAGER, COLONY COOPERATIVE FARMING UNION LTD., KHANEWAL v. SYED BASHIR HUSSAIN SHAH 1989 PLC 108
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 2 (1) The Labor Appellate Tribunal's Optical Labor…
- MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, FAISALABAD 1989 PLC 109
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Complaint Request Interim stay on the matter in conjunction with the Labor Court and National Industrial Relations Commission Complaint filed …
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. NEMAT ALI 1989 PLC 116
Section 15 (4) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25A & 38 (3), the offender convicted for misconduct, was thus subjected to prejudice, therefore, by the Labor Court case.…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT\'CORPORATION, BAHAWALPUR v. BASHIR AHMED MECHANIC 1989 PLC 118
Denial of Corruption Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25 A & 38 (3)…
- MESSRS RAVI RAYON LTD., KALA SHAH KAKU v. WORKERS UNION (REGD.) 1989 PLC 119
Articles 36 and 38 (3a) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 postponed the hearing of the practice and procedures for the applicant's evidence, the witnesses sent to the non-present parties and …
- EHSANUL RAO KHAN v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE 1989 PLC 129
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) On the appeal against the Payment of Payment Act (IV of 1936), Section 15 (2) and the payment of labor authority, the order of labor was approved by…
- ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, LABOUR WELFARE (INSPECTION), MULTAN v. OCCUPIER/MANAGER, HILAL ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LTD. 1989 PLC 167
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 35 (5) and 38 (3a) Order under the Payment of Payment Act (IV of 1936), Section 17 Payments Act, Order of Labor Court Appeal Order under Section 17 of 1936…
- OKARA TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD. v. OKARA TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD. 1989 PLC 169
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O11 One Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 2 (xxiv) Termination of Mills Services Reach…
- QUAID WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN NIAZI 1989 PLC 171
The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15, the unmanaged workman, ordered the B-shift to work instead of the shiftworkman, demanding a written…
- DISTRICT MANAGER P.R.T.C. (I.C.) R.R. FAISALABAD v. WAMUHAMMAD ASIAM 1989 PLC 225
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (4) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXII of 1969), Section 25A & 38 (3) Dismissal for misconduct, allege…
- NAIB-SUBEDAR (RETD.), MARDI KHAN v. FAUJI SUGAR MILLS, SANGLA HILLS 1989 PLC 226
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 36 and 38 (3) Practices and Procedures for Termination of Service Complaint The applicant's employer complained that the complaint was not served, sta…
- BARKAT ALI SHAH v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, LAHORE 1989 PLC 227
The provisions of Sections 8, (7) and 38 (3a) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 can only be directed to hold elections under the supervision of the Registrar only when there is a dispute betw…
- MUHAMMAD AZEEM v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1989 PLC 229
The Lahore Development Authority Act 1975 is governed by the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 1 (4) and Section O15 (4) of the Lahore …
- PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT SUPPLIES CORPORATION v. MUHAMMAD MUNEER SHAKAR 1989 PLC 230
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Complaint Request Re-organization and Objection to Reduction of Positions Aid has not been taken by the employer in response to a complaint notice and …
- GENERAL SECRETARY, AL-FATAH MAZDOOR UNION, SHAMS TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, FAISALABAD REGION, FAISALABAD 1989 PLC 231
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 8 (5), (7) and 38 (3a) to issue instructions to the Labor Court immediately by the Registrar's request regarding the selection of trade union dispute offic…
- ABDUL SHAKOOR v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION 1989 PLC 233
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3a) Application for Interim Disciplinary Complaint Complaint against the termination of service may be filed against the enforcement of an imprope…
- ABDUL HAQUE AZAD v. RUSTAM KHAN 1989 PLC 234
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 38 (3A) acknowledges an appeal against the authority's order under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 as an Appeal Forum as part of the Payment Payment Act (IV …
- LAHORE CYCLE INDUSTRIES WORKERS? UNION (CBA) v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, LAHORE REGION, LAHORE 1989 PLC 235
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 34 and 38 (3A) Reviewing the accuracy and order's supremacy in the revision, the administration was requested to challenge the trade union's ability to par…
- MANAGING DIRECTOR, UNIVERSAL OIL & VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS LIMITED, SHEIKHUPURA v. MUHAMMAD KHAN 1989 PLC 239
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii), 25 A & 38 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 2 (i) \ Labor Security, Definit…
- D1VIS10NAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAY v. KHUDA BAKHSH 1989 PLC 243
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3a) If the employee of the suspension is under his arrest, the employee may be suspended if he is already on bail. The employee's suspension order…
- MST. IJAZ BANG v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GUJRANWALA 1989 PLC 251
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A transfer appellant, a school teacher, challenged his transfer from one school to another in the same city, posted the transfer appellant and he was not…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. HAKIM ALI 1989 PLC 255
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25, Removing employees from employment, a gangman is removed from employment by verbal order, employees reinstated by the Labor Court for the crime of tree …
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. MUHAMMAD SHAM 1989 PLC 267
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Promotion is not a right but when a person is promoted, he gets his right which can only be denied for good reasons which subsequently I was pr…
- NAIMAT ALI v. DISTRICT MANAGER, G.T.S. URBAN DEPOT, SADDAR, LAHORE 1989 PLC 268
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (5) Appeals for Reinstatement of Job Reinstatement Appointed by the Appeal Tribunal of the Appellate Tribunal under the Labor Court Order Approved by the…
- SHAHID AHMAD v. DIRECTOR, P. R. T. C. 1989 PLC 269
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 15 and 38 (3A) Without any explicit action by such officer for the benefit of the workers, it was not enough to say that the union as an officer of the Uni…
- SHABBIR HUSSAIN v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION 1989 PLC 271
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Ad Transitional State Order Prima Fax Case in favor of Interim, Cancellation due to Order Complaint Petition Against Termination of Services T…
- ABDUL SATTAR v. KAKA KHEL INDUSTRIES LTD. 1989 PLC 272
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 2 (xiii), 25A, 36 (2) and 38 (3a) Civil procedure code (VV 1908), OV, R 20 Processing fee and postal costs for sending notice to practice and procedure. Th…
- RIAZ AHMAD v. SECRETARY IRRIGATION 1989 PLC 275
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 1 (4) (C), from the Service Roll to Priuso…
- WAPDA THROUGH SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (E), WAPDA CIRCLE, GUJRAT v. MIAN MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 1989 PLC 334
Sections 15 and 17 of the Wage Payment Act 1936 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 38 (3A) Waters and Power Development Authority Act (XXI of 1941), Section 17 (1B) Jurisdiction o…
- ABDUL SHAKOOR v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION 1989 PLC 340
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) An ad interim order complaint against termination of service may be sought if an unknown order is not implemented, unless the order is execute…
- ABDUL HAQUE AZAD v. RUSTAM KHAN 1989 PLC 341
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) The Payment of Payment Act (1V of 1936), Article 17 Revising the Court of Appeal as a Court of Appeal for the Payment of Wages Act as an Appeal Foru…
- LAHORE CYCLE INDUSTRIES WORKERS UNION (CBA) v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS LAHORE REGION, LAHORE 1989 PLC 342
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 34 and 38 (3A) Reviewing the accuracy and order's supremacy in the revision, the administration was requested to challenge the trade union's ability to par…
- EXECUTIVE ENGINEER v. SHEIKH SAJJAD AHMAD 1989 PLC 346
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 37 (3) Appeal memorandum is not signed by the appellant itself but is the signature of the lawyer who was only authorized to present and not to appeal…
- ALAMGIR v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES,MULTAN 1989 PLC 348
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 1 (3) (()) 25A & 38 (3) Ways, Pakistan Industrial & Commercial Employment (Stan Lang Orders) Ordinance (VII Of 1908), Section 12 (3) Complaint Request Servi…
- MUHAMMAD BASHIR v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KHAIRWALA DRAINAGE DIVISION, FAISALABAD 1989 PLC 349
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 1 (4) (c) Public Works Department Code, CHAP First Sub-Para (7) Notice of ten days' work paid employee in th…
- WORKERS\' UNION, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DIVISION 1989 PLC 350
Salary Payment Act 1936 Section 15 (2) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 38 (3a) Recovery of Wages The Appellate Court, while accepting the appeal of the respondent department, d…
- H.B.L. STAFF UNION v. CH. ASHIQ HUSSAIN 1989 PLC 352
Sections 8 and 38 (a) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, the interim order passed by the Registrar selection of new officers, but current officials are challenging the Labor Court that such a…
- GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. SIRAJ DIN 1989 PLC 353
Articles 25A, 37 and 38 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, which objected to the limitation of the request for complaint, which was barred from the application, were neither written in th…
- NISAR AHMAD v. DISTRICT MANAGER, PRTC, LAHORE 1989 PLC 356
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Deletion of Corruption Order Permitting fresh inquiry without notice to the accused worker on the basis of a prior investigation, whether requi…
- MUHAMMAD SAJID v. SENIOR PERSONNEL MANAGER, FFC, RAWALPINDI 1989 PLC 357
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Complaint request, neither submitted by the applicant to the Labor Court nor applicants appearing within the limits after the Labor Court Reque…
- MEHAR DIN v. GENERAL MANAGER, HYE SONS SUGAR MILLS LTD. 1989 PLC 358
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Certification of fitness for certification / promotion Labor court, unable to consider employer, held, Labor court employee's ability to decide…
- SHARBAZ KHAN v. POINEER STEEL MILLS LTD. 1989 PLC 359
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XVII, R 3 Complaint can be dismissed and remanded for evidence restoration, and both remedies are simultaneo…
- ZAHIDA MIRZA v. FAYYAD AHMAD, MANAGING DIRECTOR, WASA, LDA 1989 PLC 371
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (5) The contempt of court action for failing to comply with a Labor Court order goes to the accused worker when the benefit of rehabilitation is obtained…
- DIVISINAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE v. SHAH NAWAZ KHAN 1989 PLC 373
Railway employees face criminal prosecution and are kept under suspension, but did not retire due to employment where they were dismissed after accepting a complaint to the Labor Court, the suspension…
- MANZOOR HUSSAIN USMANI v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN 1989 PLC 375
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 14 Defective petition in filing a complaint alleging that the limitation of invalid petition petition was first su…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS MULI\'AR DIVISION, MULTAN v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 1989 PLC 377
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Personal Manual (Hours of Employment (Rules and Regulations), Chapter III, R-71 Complaints) On the calendar day, the remaining respondents were regular…
- NOOR MUHAMMAD v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 1989 PLC 378
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A&38 (3) Reverse Appellant Worker, a Work Mrist, was promoted to the post of AIW, having been hired, after which Appellant was directly appointed in his p…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT RAILWAYS v. ABDUL AZIZ 1989 PLC 380
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Removal of a Complaint Request from the Service Without any benefit, the complaint of complaint is not submitted by the worker within the stipulated time…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN. v. MAZHAR HUSSAIN 1989 PLC 381
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Responding to a Complaint Request Respondent asked for confirmation of the post of AIW in which he worked for only three months, after which he was poste…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, RAILWAYS, MULTAN v. MST. ZARINA TASNEEM 1989 PLC 382
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Lady Ticket Collector 5, a Certified Respondent acting as a Grade II Labor Court, has been ordered to certify as a Lady Ticket Collector Grade 11, wh…
- DIRECTOR (O & M) WASA, FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. GHULAM BILAL 1989 PLC 384
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Appellant Benefits Challenging Respondent Worker Removal, Service Has Not Prayed For Rehabilitation Because It Has Found A Better Job And Appel…
- FAUJI FERTILIZER CO. LTD. v. MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN 1989 PLC 397
Article 25A & 38 (3A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 abolished the service challenging the Labor Court's order under which employees' claim for duty was dismissed when their complaint agai…
- DISTRICT MANAGER, PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 1989 PLC 414
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 \ Employed as a replacement conductor for three years and the vacancy, against which he was working, was permanent, the employee had to be permanent at t…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. MUHAMMAD AKHTAR 1989 PLC 427
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Policy Letter No. 831 B / 132 / XIV Date 21 4 1985 Termination of Employment Employees appointed to the position of Alternate Waterman, on each occasio…
- MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. v. RIAZ AHMAD SHAHID 1989 PLC 469
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) On appeal of a complaint against dismissal for misconduct, the bank maintained the appeal, in the circumstances, accusing the employee of misap…
- A.B. MALIK v. AKHTAR HUSSAIN NUNARI 1989 PLC 471
Complaint under Articles 36, 47 and 60 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, Section 197 and Complaints under Sections 47 and 60 of the Industrial Relatio…
- ABDUL HAMEED ALVI v. AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN, FAISALABAD 1989 PLC 474
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 14 Requesting a Limitation Complaint to be Repatriated to the Applicant Due to Lack of Jurisdiction of the Industr…
- SADDAR-UD-DIN v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 1989 PLC 508
The Payment of Salary Act, 1936, is the only jurisdiction in the jurisdiction of the 15th Authority where there was a matter of deduction or delayed wages, but the aggrieved person could not decide on…
- AMIR KHAN v. MOHIB TEXTILE MILLS LTD., MUZAFFARGARH 1989 PLC 592
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Notice of a Complaint, which has been forwarded to the appellate authority or has any control over any officer / employer's definition and related employ…
- MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, RURAL SUPPLY COOPERATIVE CORPORATION LTD., LAHORE 1989 PLC 593
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 S 25 is responsible for claiming complaints against suspension restoration complaints that he has received anything during his termination of employment, say af…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD SHAFI 1989 PLC 595
Section 2 and 15 of the Payment of Wages Act 1936 the scope of the Wages Act and the applicant's petition failed to show that the defendants were receiving wages of more than Rs 1,000 in the petitione…
- NASIR SIDDIQ CORPORATION PAKISTAN LTD., SHEIKHUPURA v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL 1989 PLC 596
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 36 Proof of Assignment of Applicants as Applicants Oral evidence relating to the nature of the duties cannot be given any weight where documentary evi…
- COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LTD., MULTAN v. KHURSHID AHMAD 1989 PLC 598
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 37 Complaint Request Complaint Notice It was submitted that the complaint notice was not submitted, not written in the written statement. Such request…
- MANAGING PARTNER, MESSRS MALIK & CO. SUCCESSOR OF MUGHAL INDUSTRIES RE-ROLLING MILLS v. MUHAMMAD IOBAL 1989 PLC 600
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Section 25A Individual Complaint Scope 25. Collective bargaining agent cannot demand the provisions of Section 25A for its own benefit; Applic…
- MUHAMMAD HASSAN v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN 1989 PLC 601
Salary Payment Act 1936 Section 15 (2) Pakistan Railway Factory Loco Shade is doing repair work, employees and employees working in the vicinity of Loco Shed are considered to be factory workers, such…
- MUHAMMAD ALI v. DIRECTOR, PUNJAB EMPLOYEES\' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, FAISALABAD 1989 PLC 602
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI VI 1968), Section 1 (4), 12 (3) Complaint dismissed for misconduct by…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRIMU BARRAGE DIVISION, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT 1989 PLC 604
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 1 (4) (C) and Section O1 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25, a permanent workman und…
- MUHAMMAD SALEEM MALIK v. AGRICULTURE ENGINEER, RAWALPINDI DIVISION 1989 PLC 605
Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 Section 2 (1) (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 1 (4) (2) (xxviii) Landlord to the Government Employer Workman Unit Supervisor Bulldozer in the…
- PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION (NOW PRTC) THROUGH DISTRICT MANAGER v. RIASAT ALI 1989 PLC 608
Road Transport Workers Ordinance 1961 Sections 2 (7) and 2 (10) Payment of Wages Act (IV 1936), Section 15 and 17 Notification No. II (L IV) / 65 (I), Dated 15 12 1965 Employees Road Transport Only Se…
- PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI v. MUHAMMAD SAEED JAVED 1989 PLC 610
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 is appealing against the decisions of the Labor Court on applications under sections 25A, 37 and 38 (3) sections 25A and 34. Not eligible under section 25A…
- ABDUL SALAM v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, ALLIED & SONS (PVT.) LTD., SIALKOT CITY 1989 PLC 612
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A&38 (3) Complaint Notice and Petition Deadline Complaint Notice was submitted and a complaint was given within a limited period of two months for filing …
- FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SHABBIR HUSSAIN 1989 PLC 616
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 Appeal was rejected by default Transfer of application for re-entry Neither the Memorandum of Appeal nor the application for re-entry sign the Appellant'…
- MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. GENERAL MANAGER, SHAKARGANJ MILLS LTD., JHANG 1989 PLC 619
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 section and 14 re-employed employees are obliged to give priority to job employees at the resumption of nine mills f…
- PUNJAB PROVINCIAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 1989 PLC(CS) 621
Co-operative Society Act 1925 Sections 70A (a) and 71 (b) Cooperative Society Rules, 1927, R55 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Emplo…
- GHULAM RASOOL v. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE 1989 PLC(CS) 623
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Notice of Complaint was also presented to the officer other than the officer who passed the termination order, in which case, was properly excl…
- MESSRS BISVIL SPINNERS LTD. v. SH. MUHAMMAD YOUNAS 1989 PLC(CS) 624
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) Workman Supervisor Hanks Checker, examining hands-on articles, is thought to have kept workers without a recommendation for leave or certificatio…
- RAFIQ HUSSAIN v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, WORKSHOP DIVISION 1989 PLC(CS) 625
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii), 25 A & 38 (3) Employees Retired From Employment The Labor Court Claims Retirement Benefits On Plea Merit In The Appeal Phase 'S complaint will b…
- AMIR KHAN v. MOHIB TEXTILE MILLS LTD., MUZAFFARGARH 1989 PLC(CS) 636
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) The applicant's name was not mentioned in the complaint petition. A. Mills in which the applicant was employed, the applicant Labor Court dismi…
- KHALID MAHMOOD v. DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, FAISALABAD 1989 PLC(CS) 637
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Appeal filed by the Appellant on dismissal of service partial appeal against dismissal of complaint petition in 1982; Except for the complaint,…
- ZEESHAN ALI SHAH v. GENERAL MANAGER, HARAPPA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, SAHIWAL 1989 PLC(CS) 638
Requests for deduction for wages for fixed term with ten times compensation by the Authority on the basis of provisions 15 and 17 of the Salary Payment Act 1936 (IX of 1908 Limitation Act), Section 5 …
- KARIM BAKHSH v. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (R), ATTOCK 1989 PLC(CS) 639
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3) Payment of Payment Act (IV of 1936), Sections 15 and 17 Em 1 Employees \ Cost \ F Living (Assistance) Act, 1973 (1 of 1974), permitted by Section 6 R…
- MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, HAFIZABAD v. NIAMAT MASIH 1989 PLC(CS) 641
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 25 relied on a domestic inquiry into the investigation of the crime in the request for a dismissal against corruption charges, not presented to the Labo…
Other years — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 1999 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.