FAUJI FERTILIZER CO. LTD. versus MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN
Article 25A & 38 (3A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 abolished the service challenging the Labor Court's order under which employees' claim for duty was dismissed when their complaint against termination of their services 'S request was still pending before the Labor Court. Earlier in a complaint application, the employee prayed for a directive that when his services were terminated he should be made permanent and he prayed for his rehabilitation in another complaint request. The employee's prayer was not allowed by the Labor Court employee's improper order, which had no opportunity to be amended by the appellate tribunal and there was no reason to exercise the autonomous jurisdiction by the appellate tribunal. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
