Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A&38 (3) Reverse Appellant Worker, a Work Mrist, was promoted to the post of AIW, having been hired, after which Appellant was directly appointed in his place. Was appointed, who was in charge of the same position. By transfer, the Railway maintained a separate seniority list of direct appointments, and the respondents were encouraged that the appellant was returned because the work on which he was promoted was posted on 31 10 1986. Since another person was posted to the employee's position, the appellant was illegal before 31st 1986. Appellant obtained a stay order on his reversal order and he was the last to work. And has been told that his position did not result in any financial loss to his wages, such a worker is again another AEW member. Was promoted against the post. It was therefore deemed that the appellant was regularly employed on one AIW 31 AI 10 in 1986 the reverse order was set aside. family advocate from Kahuta lawyer