DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN. versus MAZHAR HUSSAIN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Responding to a Complaint Request Respondent asked for confirmation of the post of AIW in which he worked for only three months, after which he was posted because the Land Inspector responded. The payer did not complete a period of one year as required for certification. The relevant award and the Land Inspector's unchanged letters could not claim validation against the assignment from one post to another, and according to the relevant award, it was also necessary to pass the test for certification, which did not even prove it. It happened that Claire had not. The respondents' names were brought to the pen of the Development Committee by the respondents only for the purpose of sanity but it was not enough to conclude that they had passed the examination, the lower court had requested the respondent's complaint. Failed to consider the correct position while accepting. Certified as Labor Court AIW order removes any complaint Defendant dismisses employee's request
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
