DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS MULI\'AR DIVISION, MULTAN versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Personal Manual (Hours of Employment (Rules and Regulations), Chapter III, R-71 Complaints) On the calendar day, the remaining respondents were regular workers who received continuous 24-hour rest in a calendar day. It is claimed that the employees have to prove that they are not a permanent worker. The respondents based their decision on Rule 71 of the Advance Chapter III of the Customs Code of Conduct. Allowed to file a complaint but said it had no rules and no other law, The rest was allowed, and the respondents who worked in the locks also said that Rule 71, which applies to all railway employees on duty rosters, was implemented a week ago and was not shown Laws are against any provision of the Order. Labor order was not sustained under the Law Order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Chashma lawyer
