NISAR AHMAD versus DISTRICT MANAGER, PRTC, LAHORE
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Deletion of Corruption Order Permitting fresh inquiry without notice to the accused worker on the basis of a prior investigation, whether required to be absent from Labor for 14 days. Given the charge of Inquiry Officer, the designated accused was wrongly disclosed, resulting in the failure to appear before the Inquiry Officer as a result of the Inquiry and Inquiry. In this way the former Labor Court fixed the dismissal order and allowed the employer to conduct a fresh investigation. Before the inquiry, however, the nature of the offense should have been considered a crime, though misconduct but not serious, the pursuit of justice could have been fulfilled if the dismissal order was kept to no avail and no fresh inquiry allowed. Should have Appellate Tribunal has been ordered to be restored without any benefit and without permission to conduct status F Race inquiry set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Dera Murad Jamali lawyer