WAPDA THROUGH SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (E), WAPDA CIRCLE, GUJRAT versus MIAN MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN
Sections 15 and 17 of the Wage Payment Act 1936 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 38 (3A) Waters and Power Development Authority Act (XXI of 1941), Section 17 (1B) Jurisdiction of Wapda Employees The Payment of Compensation Act, 1936, claims for wages of suspension period and claims against the authority order and appeals were excluded that the matter relating to the terms and conditions of employment of WAPDA employee has been declared as Government Employee. It was therefore not under the jurisdiction of the authority. In what circumstances can a job be suspended after a restoration order set aside by the Labor Appellate Tribunal and under what circumstances is it entitled to wages and the parties have the opportunity to give evidence at the time of the presence of the case? After that, the decision has been remanded to the appellate court. The absence of the terms of service and the terms of service related to the suspension period and the suspension of compensation should the avenue first decide whether there was a question of the terms and conditions of service and then the question of whether the payment of salaries Act, 1936 And the jurisdiction of the authority can be finally decided.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
